You are reading a single comment by @ReekBlefs and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Well the initial accusation was that he (his spokesperson) refused to say that the policy would be cancelled, not that it was unethical. I don't think the two are equivalent.
The accusation I'm refuting is the second part of the sentence: "But declines to clarify if Starmer believes it is morally wrong."
ReekBlefs
aggi
Well the initial accusation was that he (his spokesperson) refused to say that the policy would be cancelled, not that it was unethical. I don't think the two are equivalent.
I don't mind Starmer but I do think he came across as weak on that BBC interview. There seemed to be some unnecessary vagueness and equivocation, almost being lead by the interviewer. He could have condemned it in stronger terms right at the start.
I don't really understand why he struggled, it seems a pretty easy policy to be very strongly against.