+1
and on this
Leaping to the defence of a man who an English court found to be justifiably described as a wife-beater?
That was in relation to a defence to defamation so I think you need to be a little careful about about implying a criminal burden of proof.
Sorry, how does “found to be justifiably described as a wife beater” imply a criminal burden of proof? If I was implying a criminal burden of proof I’d have just said “found to be a wife beater”. I was literally being careful about it.
@Eejit started
London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed is a community of predominantly fixed gear and single-speed cyclists in and around London, UK.
This site is supported almost exclusively by donations. Please consider donating a small amount regularly.
+1
and on this
That was in relation to a defence to defamation so I think you need to be a little careful about about implying a criminal burden of proof.