• +1

    and on this

    Leaping to the defence of a man who an English court found to be justifiably described as a wife-beater?

    That was in relation to a defence to defamation so I think you need to be a little careful about about implying a criminal burden of proof.

  • Sorry, how does “found to be justifiably described as a wife beater” imply a criminal burden of proof? If I was implying a criminal burden of proof I’d have just said “found to be a wife beater”. I was literally being careful about it.

About

Avatar for Eejit @Eejit started