-
There are dozens if not hundreds of people of similar or greater personal wealth than the Royal Family who do not contribute as they should. Many of them also benefitted from the seizure of land and property in the distant past.
Sure, lets fantasize about toppling the Royal Family as much as we like. But i'd rather people were less antsy about the Queen and more vocal about getting the other cunts to pay their fair share.
Can't we do both?
-
But i'd rather people were less antsy about the Queen and more vocal about getting the other cunts to pay their fair share.
It's not either/or. How about we get all the cunts to pay their fair share? That includes the spits royals.
-
I agree with this to an extent. People like the Duke of Westminster and Earl Cadogan have 10-20 times the wealth of the queen that's all largely inherited.
But, the royal family have a role in setting the laws that they seem more than willing to exploit (whether them personally or advisers looking to "protect" them) which does make the position of the monarchy different to the other cunts.
You are reading a single comment by @Stonehedge and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
n3il
hippy
aggi
@Stonehedge
I suppose my personal position is this. There are dozens if not hundreds of people of similar or greater personal wealth than the Royal Family who do not contribute as they should. Many of them also benefitted from the seizure of land and property in the distant past.
Sure, lets fantasize about toppling the Royal Family as much as we like. But i'd rather people were less antsy about the Queen and more vocal about getting the other cunts to pay their fair share.
Maybe once we've achieved that, we can go about seizing private assets from Royalty and putting their heads on spikes or whatever.