You are reading a single comment by @William. and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
If that's their point, I don't think it was well communicated by the initial post https://www.lfgss.com/comments/16520537/ and that's what caused 'controversy'. It's not an argument about military strategy.
hoefla
@William.
@nick_h. 's point isn't that contraversial. He's explaining Russia war Crimes by saying Russian Generals believe war Crimes bring strategic success. Russian soldiers may also simply be evil, brutalised murderers. But that's not the only reason they kill civilians. They are encouraged from higher up for strategic reasons. The question of whether war Crimes ever DO bring strategic advantage is a separate one, it seems odd people are sniping at each other over this.