Aha. So the new evidence available to Durham police is a seemingly unrelated invitation to a zoom quiz (that Starmer says he didn't attend and was hosted in another building) and an agenda that included what appears to be a working dinner with the local MP at that night.
Mail/Sun/MoS readers going potty at this being a smoking gun.
I'm confused because if anything, doesn't it strengthen his case that it was a working dinner?
There is no rationalising this stuff. It's delegitimising through constant undermining, negative headlines and quiet retractions. The undercurrent of "they're all as bad as each other" is getting stronger based on my litmus test (my dad). It's fucking trash.
Aha. So the new evidence available to Durham police is a seemingly unrelated invitation to a zoom quiz (that Starmer says he didn't attend and was hosted in another building) and an agenda that included what appears to be a working dinner with the local MP at that night.
Mail/Sun/MoS readers going potty at this being a smoking gun.
I'm confused because if anything, doesn't it strengthen his case that it was a working dinner?