You are reading a single comment by @Stonehedge and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • That said, there are also the people who are saying that Putin is right to regard NATO as a threat...which is much less arguable.

    is it?

    Anyway, to resolve a conflict you have to understand exactly what has driven your enemy to get to this point, whether you agree or not

    ftfy

    We don't agree with Putin, doesn't mean we can't understand him. Understanding him isn't excusing him.

  • Understanding him isn't excusing him.

    Its the same as why Thatcher and her government had so many meetings with the IRA in secret. The Good Friday Agreement was a result of years of people engaging with the terrorists behind closed doors not just something that fell into place out of the blue.

    Its easy to say "whats the point?" about these things but as you say understanding how your enemy got to this point is crucial for resolving the situation.

    It grinds my gears a little bit to hear people criticising Macron for talking to Putin for example. Another example would be the heat that Corbyn got from meeting with the IRA (and why the government kept their meetings secret).

  • Yep, Ian Paisley Jnr made the point on R4 earlier that seeing Sinn Fein win today is not a result that thrills him but it is along way from the troubles and everyone should celebrate the success of turning from violence to politics over the last couple of decades

About

Avatar for Stonehedge @Stonehedge started