-
• #327
Is it possible to track down the source for this stem/bar in line mounting idea?
Another reason why level top tubes are superior.
-
• #328
Rotate the bars a tiiiny bit up on the MS, and the levers should automatically be good as well.
-
• #329
Absolutely not. Bike geometry should fit people not geometric paradigms
-
• #330
Otherwise lovely bike ruined
1 Attachment
-
• #331
What I mean is, nobody in their right mind would angle their bars and stem like your picture on level top tubed bikes.
For some reason people want everything to be in line with their sloping top tubes.
-
• #332
Are you high?
1 Attachment
-
• #333
The exception that proves the rule. Quills automatically do half the work for you.
Most people are sane enough to not point the bars upwards when using a quill. Unless their bike is too big for them.
-
• #334
🙃
-
• #335
But you're right, you can see how they aligned the ramps with their rising stem.
-
• #336
All day long baby
1 Attachment
-
• #337
Thank you
-
• #338
oooft
-
• #339
.
1 Attachment
-
• #340
Verdict on this please
-
• #341
Passable imo, shifters could go up but bars look like neo-classics so they probably don't have much room to move
-
• #342
I agree if hoods can come up I'd move the bars down. The bars are obviously designed for the bottom bit of the drops being horizontal
-
• #343
been contemplating whether to post this here or to anti
1 Attachment
-
• #344
I can’t seem to find my bikes featured- have I gotten away with it?
-
• #345
lol This person needs a slightly bigger frame I think. They must be tall! that's already a 58 / 60?
-
• #346
I can’t seem to find my bikes featured- have I gotten away with it?
-
• #347
-
• #348
-
• #349
They all look great to me. This is why BDHU is a death cult.
-
• #350
All shite
3 Attachments
I can't see a big gap in the bar tape around the lever clamp, so he has that going for him