If the goal is to stop the human traficking and to stop people from risking their lives crossing the channel, can anybody think of a worse policy than the Rwanda plan?
Serious question. Is it actually possible to devise a plan that is worse value for money and less likely to work?
If the goal is to stop the human traficking and to stop people from risking their lives crossing the channel, can anybody think of a worse policy than the Rwanda plan?
Serious question. Is it actually possible to devise a plan that is worse value for money and less likely to work?