-
Is it actually possible to devise a plan that is worse value for money and less likely to work?
Depends on what your view of its purpose is - if it's to give out an image of brutally inhumane hatred of refugees while proposing something clearly illegal and unworkable, which will also give opportunities to attack the judicial and democratic procedures that will stop it, it's likely to work.
If the goal is to stop the human traficking and to stop people from risking their lives crossing the channel, can anybody think of a worse policy than the Rwanda plan?
Serious question. Is it actually possible to devise a plan that is worse value for money and less likely to work?