-
• #2
Level top tube for me. Actually have never owned a bike with a sloping top tube.
-
• #3
That quirk is absolutely outrageous.
Both compact and classic geo have their place.
-
• #4
-
• #5
I think horizontal is generally better for steel bikes aesthetically, if its overly compact and not slammed or with pointy up enve stem it looks too mamil-y for my liking. Whereas horizontal top tube/stem/bars all aligned are extremely nice and easy to get right.
-
• #6
100% dependant on the riders fit. If you haven't got a significant drop from the saddle to the bars then a horizontal top tube is gonna look poo because either you have no seatpost showing and a high standover or you have a tonne of spacers or positive stem. Compact solves this.
I actually used to prefer horizontal top tubes but now prefer compact geoMy current bike is horizontal, my next is compact
-
• #7
100% dependant on the riders fit.
Funny, I choose it 100% based on esthetics.
-
• #8
I’m on a frame building course soon and have about 8/9cm drop from saddle to bar. I prefer the aesthetic of horizontal, but every ‘instagramable’ bike seems to be designed for someone with a ridiculous leg to torso ratio
-
• #9
Better off sloping?
1 Attachment
-
• #10
Sloping and a shorter headtube with less aggressive stem if it was mine
-
• #11
Dave Yates said to me when I asked for a very slight drop on the top tube on my only custom frame: 'It'll look like a mistake'.
He was perhaps right, but I rather like it. Was copying (purely aesthetic) a really lovely 853 Rourke track frame that @picco was riding at the time - think it came from a certain wheelmagician before that - that had a really subtle drop on the TT.
There are loads of threads on the internet about compact vs traditional geo from a performance point of view. In the end there doesn’t seem to be much in it, other than aesthetics. What do you prefer?
2 Attachments