You are reading a single comment by @Dammit and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
an older Rolex GMT and saw what could be achieved.
Yes, there's a lot of truth in this. It is just so much chonkier than GMTs of yesteryear and it looks so clumsy by comparison. And that is why, until the day I die, the 6542 will be my forever grail and in this market likely a 1675, too. Grail as in unattainable.
I was close to buying a Tudor GMT until I compared the case height/depth with an older Rolex GMT and saw what could be achieved. I'd need to see the new one in person, and the height may well make it a straight "no".
I'm not a huge fan of the riveted bracelet but it is what it is - could always change that.
I miss my Steinhart Freccione homage, this Tudor looks like a version of that which has a proper GMT function. I'll certainly pop into a `Tudor dealer to have a look at one.