• The Pace geo chart is with a 140mm fork, unsagged, offset bushing in the high position, 29” wheels.

    I’m running it with the offset bushing in the lower position, with a 150mm fork, and a 27.5” rear wheel.

    I think that this means I have probably shortened up the reach quite a bit- and I’m wondering whether it was that, plus the slightly lower BB that contributed to the “ah, this turns in much better!” feeling that I had the first time I rode it as a mullet.

    Does this make sense?

    I’m worried that comparing a geo chart of the Pace that is probably not very accurate to the accurate geo chart of the Madonna is leading me to make the wrong decision on frame size.

  • I think this chap has an interesting take on bike fit.

    https://www.leelikesbikes.com/dynamic-mtb-fit

    The bike rotates around the BB so what is important for dynamic bike fit is the distance from bars to BB. It is a very different take than stack/reach but focuses on getting the bike setup to make it optimal for hinge positions and rowing/pushing the bars.

About