-
I’d be fascinated to hear why you feel he deserves benefit of the doubt, following a high profile, public failure that cost many people a great deal of money which he raked out of a business which he knew was sinking. Better read that article again.
-
I’ll side step the patronising tone.
I appreciate I’m heavily biased by the fact I was working at Barclays just out of uni at the time of the crash. That’s meant I’ve never invested in a company because I’ve never been in a position where I’ve felt I could loose all of anything that would be worthwhile investing.
Maybe I’m giving too much benefit of the doubt. Can’t see how not paying himself would have really changed much?
I’ve also no idea what that sort of capital really means in the world of coats but seems he started this time with a pre order model and has out grown that?