You are reading a single comment by @Velocio and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • If you don’t have s no fly zone it will be difficult for the Ukrainians to bring up supplies their lines of communication are far longer than the Russians.

  • If you don’t have s no fly zone it will be difficult for the Ukrainians to bring up supplies their lines of communication are far longer than the Russians.

    Sure, but it cannot be enforced without putting NATO air forces directly against Russian air forces.

    It's a WWIII scenario.

  • WWIII air defence over Europe was supposed to have a forward zone of attack helicopters,A10, Frogfoots etc then a missile belt then an air defence zone patrolled by F15s . Maybe the Ukrainians could establish a missile belt and inch it forward, the Russians would do the same over their troops giving a defacto no fly zone.

    The areas were split up like this to stop “friendly Fire” I don’t think anyone can identify a moving aircraft at 3km.

    Stinger missiles should curtail tactical air power but LGBs probably allow attacks on supply lines from higher altitude.

About

Avatar for Velocio @Velocio started