his stance on the skripal affair (his actual stance, not the rw caricature rooted in baseless smears that eventually took hold in the press and parliament) struck me as eminently reasonable - not sure what you mean about his delivery.
if your political opponents (including many in your party and the so-called progressive press) are going to outright lie about your positions and propagate endless snide innuendos which suggest you (and your milieu) are "pro-putin", you're on a hiding to nothing regardless how you deliver this
That article was written after his original statements on Salisbury, where amongst other things he asked if the UK was going to hand over samples so the Russians could analyse them.
his stance on the skripal affair (his actual stance, not the rw caricature rooted in baseless smears that eventually took hold in the press and parliament) struck me as eminently reasonable - not sure what you mean about his delivery.
if your political opponents (including many in your party and the so-called progressive press) are going to outright lie about your positions and propagate endless snide innuendos which suggest you (and your milieu) are "pro-putin", you're on a hiding to nothing regardless how you deliver this