What's funny about the article's critique of Starmer is the opening gambit is his questioning of the legality of Iraq.
There is nothing inconsistent about being against illegal wars while being pro legal ones.
That said I agree with a lot of the points made. So classic centrist dad really.
Just throwing a penny in the pot then running away quickly…
How can any war be a ‘legal war’?
How can any war be an "illegal war"?
I suppose if you want to define something illegal you are acknowledgeing the framework that makes it so. That framework may also make it legal in some cases.
@pdlouche started
London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed is a community of predominantly fixed gear and single-speed cyclists in and around London, UK.
This site is supported almost exclusively by donations. Please consider donating a small amount regularly.
What's funny about the article's critique of Starmer is the opening gambit is his questioning of the legality of Iraq.
There is nothing inconsistent about being against illegal wars while being pro legal ones.
That said I agree with a lot of the points made. So classic centrist dad really.