You are reading a single comment by @hugo7 and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • I guess this was in response to the photos of coffee shops? For what, like $300? This is exactly what’s getting me. How the *#$¥ is $300 for a non fungible jpeg of a €^%>ing coffee shop an attractive offer?

    Could you imagine someone in the real world trying to sell you the same thing for the same price? It’s just laughable.

    Greed/Hype/Supreme/1% club I completely agree is probably the case with the apes and stuff. I can understand this a bit more with regards sheer ego boosting. But a photo of a coffee shop???

  • But a photo of a coffee shop???

    How about a vintage camera you'll never use to take a photo?

    Or a toy in it's box that you can't play with?

    To me it's just collectables being collectables.

    (Cue all the people jumping in to explain why their piece of old mass produced furniture/watch with a brand name and an inflated value is a rational collectable.)

  • Or some mushed paint on a canvas

  • My only challenge is that I get its a one off, but it's a one off in an infinite series of one offs.

    (also,a limited watch series is hoax...)

  • I have no cameras I don’t use.
    I have no toys in boxes.
    I like trainers, which I wear.
    I like bikes, which I use.
    I like real art, which I can appreciate on my wall.

    Maybe if I built a metaverse gallery I would value NFTs because without them my metagallery would have bare walls.

  • I think there is a physical collectable and this shite.

About

Avatar for hugo7 @hugo7 started