You are reading a single comment by @rhowe and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Well, yes tbh. Excluding renters probably opens up a massive loophole.
    I'm tempted to say it should apply to both the owner of the property and to tenants, in some kind of proportion.

  • Perhaps one part can be for sewers and other maintenance so tenants pay it, the other part can be based on capital value?

    Increases in local taxes aren't going to be popular. Perhaps if they are matched with resident panels for oversight it's more palatable?

    Cos paying taxes going to a "turd country" / we just chuck some tarmac in a hole and call it done private company for maintenance for a profit.. cha. They better do a good job then.

  • I'm tempted to say it should apply to both the owner of the property and to tenants, in some kind of proportion.

    split it into two parts, one for the land, one for the property.

    owner always pays "council tax" for the land.

    occupier pays for property council tax based on size/value.

About

Avatar for rhowe @rhowe started