-
Indeed, which is why it's not necessary for houses to increase in prices continuously. That may be a red herring for homeowners but it's not a red herring for people like me who can't afford a house.
I agree completely. There are various reasons why house prices are going up (the double-income trap being one, which might be slightly blunted if people re-prioritise their work/life balance due to Covid). I think the red herring I was referring to was seeing an increase in the value of someone's primary residence as an increase in their realisable assets.
I agree, but shoes and beds are not thought of like investments, and the prices of shoes and beds are probably going down in real terms rather than up at a startling rate. I only support a tax like CGT in its capacity to curb the use of property as an investment and to limit growth to match wages/inflation.
I think houses as primary residences are "Vimes Boots"-type investments. They don't effectively make you ready money, but they greatly reduce your expenditure, while providing you with something you need. The challenge is to find a tax that reflects the fact that a (first) house is a home, rather than just an investment vessel.
You don't need to explain that to me! I feel this pain every month when a large chunk of my salary goes down the drain
With you there! I'm renting at the moment too.
Indeed, which is why it's not necessary for houses to increase in prices continuously. That may be a red herring for homeowners but it's not a red herring for people like me who can't afford a house.
I agree, but shoes and beds are not thought of like investments, and the prices of shoes and beds are probably going down in real terms rather than up at a startling rate. I only support a tax like CGT in its capacity to curb the use of property as an investment and to limit growth to match wages/inflation.
You don't need to explain that to me! I feel this pain every month when a large chunk of my salary goes down the drain