-
• #10252
9000 is looking very dated now. 9100 will prevail.
-
• #10253
Wrong
-
• #10254
they're both very nice
-
• #10255
It takes a special frame and a hhs connoisseur to know when to reach for the 9000 off the top shelf. When executed correctly it’s unrivalled.
A 9100 can be thrown onto any old frame.
-
• #10256
HHSRococoBike
-
• #10257
Indeed.
1 Attachment
-
• #10259
Dura Ace 9000 has been boldly going where no one should ever go. imo.
-
• #10260
Okay wow. This is must be another sit down / stand up topic.
You guys obviously stand up. And that’s totally cool.
-
• #10261
It works very well on your bike, which is what you may be referring to in post #10255.
-
• #10262
Never liked 9000, just looks like someone took a sander to some Metreas. Much prefer 9100/9200.
If it works better, it looks better
Like tri bikes? Or is this comment chainset specific?
-
• #10263
You people are insane. 9000 is the bees knees. Any DA for that matter
Edit: I apologise for implying that DA 7900 is goodlooking. Totally forgot about that one.
1 Attachment
-
• #10264
9200 looks like someone has been taking the hammer to some 9100
-
• #10265
It also reminds me a lot of the evergreen 6800
-
• #10266
you are a nightmare for the shimano innovation centre. they would like to erase 6800 from your mind.
-
• #10267
TBH I’d love some 7800 in my life.
-
• #10268
For the FC-9000 gang
1 Attachment
-
• #10269
Was just about to post the same image of 7800.
I loved DA9000 and thought it was the best looking group so far. But I'm not sure anything will ever surpass the aesthetics of 7800.
When 9100 cranks came out it looked like Shimano thought
"Hey ya know those big thick ugly ass black campag cranks? Lets try make DA9100 look at least as bad." -
• #10270
.
1 Attachment
-
• #10271
Really want a set of these. Stupid money though.
-
• #10272
Came out 4 years after DA9000.
-
• #10273
oh wow. if that had a ceramic speed rear mech then it's be a thread ender.
-
• #10274
for your eyes
-
• #10275
Why has somebody written Dura-Ace on those Alivio cranks?
hear hear, but you confirm my point. shimano optimises and compensates its aesthtic choice of 4-arm design with beefier chainrings ( see tessalated ones on r7000)
The arms might be placed closer to stress areas, but as you say,that still makes the longer boltless section a thing to be adressed.
Shifting ramps and efficiency is another matter.