kl-
As the story says Zerforschung first picked up the discrepancy but the BBC collected data from as many Serbian test results as they could (56 in total) and plotted them on a timeline.
The story does go into quite a lot of detail on this if you actually read it ;)
-
The lack of any attempt at explaining the discrepancies means the suggestion of wrongdoing is going more mainstream?
With PCR, is it not really unlikely you'd go from positive to negative so quickly anyway. I returned positive PCRs for at least a month after infection (ONS study). So even if his first test was legit, wouldn't it suggest a false positive rather than an actual infection?
It's mega murky whatever the truth is. Its a good soap opera though as you can just revel in it rather than be too fussed about any of the implications.
You are reading a single comment by @kl and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
Fox
Scrabble
Interesting, if unsurprising: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/59999541
Doubt cast over Djokovic test timing. Would love for this to be his downfall.