You are reading a single comment by @greentricky and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • I reckon that’s the point. We already know it’s a sham. So corruptly delaying or burying it is the least worst option.

  • I don't get the argument that they don't want it released so as not to prejudice the investigation. It's not like it is going before a Jury, so assume the Met don't want public opinion against them when they decide it doesn't mean the threshold for prosecution.

  • In fairness this is convention. And about separation of powers.

    The idea is that if you have a public body opining on a police investigation if could influence or pressure the police.

    Obvs have no doubt that the Johnson government* gives zero fucks about convention or separation of powers. But it is not new.

    *also have no doubt that historically there have been other motives.

About

Avatar for greentricky @greentricky started