What's the point being argued here?
Because I'm trying to understand what's being asked/stated.
I've said "hey, it's interesting how that even though we might think we can't use case data, it actually matches what's going on with the ONS prevalence estimates".
What's the point being argued here?
Because I'm trying to understand what's being asked/stated.
I've said "hey, it's interesting how that even though we might think we can't use case data, it actually matches what's going on with the ONS prevalence estimates".