-
I'm just watching the replay of the House of Commons discussion from earlier today. It certainly seems that there is support behind us (Derby) and these legal actions don't seem to have much to stand on.
There was a statement from an site owner of a Boro forum saying that Gibson had given them details of how they came up with the £45m figure and it was based on betting odds... Try to get that to hold up in a court of law.
The language used by EFL and Boro statements isn't very professional at all and the EFL statement contradicts itself and earlier statements regarding us on several occasions. I'm hoping we get an update from our side soon and that this can all be over with.
Just a minor matter of the East Midlands Derby this weekend. No big deal. Could be the last one ever, we could have no players left if all sold off for scrap value and we could have no manager if the media get their preferred candidate for the Toffee job...
You are reading a single comment by @roboto and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
roboto
Tonts
Yes, I saw the EFL one. All looks very messy.
Boro won 5 of the last 6 that season (think you might have the wrong season with lost 4 of the last 5) but it's pretty rare that teams come sixth and go up. I guess the £40m is potential premier league money split four ways.
Boro complaining about a team being subsidised by their owner is a bit rich though. They've been racking up losses funded by Gibson for years.