Another point to bring up is that legal precedents like this one immediately become part of
the UK's written constitution
They don't. A jury verdict does not set precedent.
Does this create a precedent? Does it mean that anybody can now pull down a statute of somebody they don’t like without consequence?
No. And no. Jury verdicts create no precedent in law. If a case with exactly the same facts were tried tomorrow by a different jury, that jury would be entitled to convict.
They don't. A jury verdict does not set precedent.