You are reading a single comment by @eskay and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
There are lots of examples, but the casual undermining of THE extent of the Soviets role in WWII in favour of the USA and Britain is an obvious one.
This is a good read:
https://www.waterstones.com/book/stalingrad/antony-beevor/9780141032405
My biggest bugbear about the "changing history" argument, asides from it not making sense, is that I never hear anyone complaining about quite major revisionist history that is happily spread in general discourse.
There are lots of examples, but the casual undermining of THE extent of the Soviets role in WWII in favour of the USA and Britain is an obvious one.