Revise history on the fly by destroying monuments?
This is bullshit too, history isn't changed by getting rid of a statue
My biggest bugbear about the "changing history" argument, asides from it not making sense, is that I never hear anyone complaining about quite major revisionist history that is happily spread in general discourse.
There are lots of examples, but the casual undermining of THE extent of the Soviets role in WWII in favour of the USA and Britain is an obvious one.
My biggest bugbear about the "changing history" argument, asides from it not making sense, is that I never hear anyone complaining about quite major revisionist history that is happily spread in general discourse.
There are lots of examples, but the casual undermining of THE extent of the Soviets role in WWII in favour of the USA and Britain is an obvious one.