Will they go for the old style "we have a claim to your country so we'll attack your military until you give up, killing and maiming civilians on the way" or the more modern Americanised "We believe your country is a threat to the world so we'll attack the terrorists and accidentally kill and maim civilians on the way."
It's more the latter, we believe your a pawn of the west and your country represents a threat to our Sovereignty and way of life, therefore we will take everything east of the Dnieper as a warning and buffer
Will they go for the old style "we have a claim to your country so we'll attack your military until you give up, killing and maiming civilians on the way" or the more modern Americanised "We believe your country is a threat to the world so we'll attack the terrorists and accidentally kill and maim civilians on the way."