You are reading a single comment by @.mo. and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • You know it is possible have a balanced view, where you find Rittenhouse morally repugnant, but also are able to understand an argument of self defense?
    Rittenhouse has a verbal confrontation with Rosenbaum and Ziminski, who is armed.
    Rittenhouse runs away, Ziminski fires his weapon, Rosenbaum chases Rittenhouse into another carpark. Rittenhouse fires his weapon.

    Huber is the third person to attack Rittenhouse after Rosenbaum has been killed, the first to do so with a weapon and the first to do so when he is on the floor.

    Again, being able to understand the basis of his self defense claim is not the same as agreeing with his stances on anything else .

About

Avatar for .mo. @.mo. started