• On speaker size.. true the drivers have a certain depth. But I don't see why a cabinet needs to be in portrait mode, or that the cabinet needs to be 2x or 3x the depth of the driver.

    An octagon cabinet (or a big square one) holding a driver with central tweeter would provide the cabinet more space and more consistently shaped space internally.

    I'm frustrated in my shopping as everything that claims to be a bookshelf speaker option is above 30cm depth when I have height and width to spare.

    I can only conclude the bookshelves suited for bookshelf speakers only hold art books.

  • There are lots of “golden ratio” cabinet designs that are shallower and wider / taller.

    Cabinets are usually deeper to avoid internal reflections from the back panel. If they’re active that’s where the amp goes too.

  • Sure...

    But here are in-wall speakers, the KEF Architectural ones and it's an 8" (20cm) driver https://uk.kef.com/products/ci200rs which only requires 4.7"/12cm of depth in a wall.

    It is clearly possible to produce high quality speakers with shallow requirements on the cabinet, it only appears to be a choice to not do so.

    Even the PSI Audio's on my desk have 4" (10cm) drivers and only have a depth of 6.7" (17cm) on the cabinet.

    It's hard to even find great passive speakers which are shallow enough for a bookshelf and yet could fill a room with expansive and high quality music.

About

Avatar for dbr @dbr started