You are reading a single comment by @HousecatHST and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • My point is that even in a city where it is easy and convenient for many people (obvs not all) to live day to day without cars, the cultural desirability of cars remains a problem underlying their excessive use. I'm sure it could be done in different, more effective, less smelly hippies ways, but it's valid that that idea needs countering and deflating. And the oversized power car - even if it actually doesn't use that much fuel - is a particular display of excess.

    I'm not disagreeing with your point at all, what I'm saying is that taking aim at aspirational cars for protest plays into the hands of those who wish to discount all and any such protest.

    It's very easy for someone to say "you're just envious of others success" when you target large and expensive cars.

    Depends on what your goals from the protest are, I suppose - if you want to change the mind of the person who doesn't believe in climate change but is inclined to easy narratives based around envy that are promoted by the Mail etc then I suggest that reinforcing them is not the best way of doing so.

    If it's just to feel good about protesting, I guess it works.

  • It's very easy for someone to say "you're just envious of others success" when you target large and expensive cars.

    If your the kind of person that would make this sort of disingenuous argument you’re just as likely to moan that you’re targeting working people just like the insulates Britain protests, if you take a different approach.

    You’re never gonna win the argument with these people and it’s pointless trying to.

  • Then - literally - what are you doing?

    If you think that you are doomed to failure, that your method of protest won’t actually work but you are going to do it anyway then it’s not a protest- it’s a tantrum.

About

Avatar for HousecatHST @HousecatHST started