You are reading a single comment by @bens0n and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • I think this has been tabled before. But incompetence>corruption.

    It seems many people see corruption as part of the game and ‘getting things done’. Needs to be tied to personal losses in the electorate to stick.

    When is Labour going to hire he-who-shall-not-be-named?

  • It seems many people see corruption as part of the game and ‘getting things done’

    Yep, I think there is unfortunately a significant element of truth to this. The pursuit of power has been valorised to the extent that actions such as this appear as displays of strong leadership. It's hard not to feel as though the Tories are going through a process of Orbanisation now—there is literally nothing standing in their way.

    I'm glad Starmer has finally started to use the word 'corruption' but as others have stated I doubt it will stick, not least because his hands aren't exactly clean—remember when he refused to name his campaign donors?

  • I thought it was more a case of “they all have their snouts in the trough” rather than strong leadership.

  • remember when he refused to name his campaign donors?

    His campaign donors were all published in Hansard on time and in full. That was a non-story.

About

Avatar for bens0n @bens0n started