-
Thanks for the input - was curious what you thought, having lived with the multicharger... I guess the GSD doesn't look as versatile, since it's got smaller wheels, so I have an immediate reaction that "all the parts must be really bespoke and difficult/expensive to replace" when it's probably not much of a difference.
@chiroshi I think the bergamont models are very tempting, and the overall weight limit seems suited to two kids, but I wasn't sure whether that rear rack was long enough for two children (having just looked up a geo chart, though I see the bergamont LT cargoville is 1.314m long vs 1.25m for the R&M multi).
Looks like it will be a test ride between the Bergamont and the Tern GSD and see what the other half goes for!
jdmitch-
look at the benno, its quality is much higher than the gsd, which is now and akward and ugly bike!
-
I guess it depends on how old your kids are. Here's a picture with a child seat mounted on the front of the rack, still looks like plenty of space behind to fit a second.
-
multicharger
too 'big' and heavy, standover too tall for my partner
tern appeals on paper because smaller wheels, smaller bikes and well priced accessories, can adapt as the kid gets older
sbbohr
chiroshi
amey
I had a multicharger, I would go for GSD for this purpose every time