You are reading a single comment by @Sharkstar and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
As someone who's spent the last four years in litigation with my freeholder that gives me the cold shivers. That'd expose so much space for our (aggressive third party offshore) freeholder to operate. I imagine with absent or uninterested freeholders its a manageable risk but by lord it's not a position I'd be comfortable in.
I think I get it - so a freeholder wouldn't need to be involved in the sale itself (assuming the terms of the lease allowed such a sale), just potentially informed once the lease has changed hands?