You are reading a single comment by @hurricane_run and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Is that the sound of straws being clutched at?

    The only iffy thing here is some procedural errors from ten years ago. There is zero evidence of doping.

  • The blood continues to thicken...

    ftfy?

  • The plot thins...

    If I've understood this correctly;

    1. BC were concerned about possible supplement contamination
    2. They asked UKADA if it would be OK to conduct sampling and testing to check, outside of normal anti-doping
    3. A UKADA employee incorrectly said this was fine
About