• If an abstract painting already captures everything you want to see about a subject, is photo realism an irritating distraction?

    There's two main types of painting: bad paintings and good paintings. "what's the point of painting realistically, now we have photographs?" is definitely a TL;DR question. Bad photo realist paintings are definitely irritating. By bad I don't mean technically deficient, but vacant, glib, slick, facile etc. Someone like Chuck Close plays skillfully with the photographic image, he makes it into something else, his pictures embody a process of pulling something apart and trying to understand it.

    I love good abstract paintings for the same reasons I love good figurative paintings; they provoke an emotional response: communication with another human being via a physical object.

    Appreciation of a work of art can't really be quantified in terms of technical success. Rather, I think we decide if we like a thing for emotional, illogical reasons, then justify that reaction retrospectively by picking out physical characteristics and pretending to explain them.

    So, I love a vinyl record because it's physical presence means something, the ritual of cleaning, storing, playing it means something, you could trick me by piping a digital recording into the room and I probably wouldn't notice the difference. Maybe we all all brains in vats etc

    PARKLIFE

  • I've got some fucking awful things on vinyl. Don't love them at all. One of them is 'Some Girls' by Racey.
    Mind you it would be shit on cd, minidisc and streaming as well.

About

Avatar for villa-ru @villa-ru started