You are reading a single comment by @Dramatic_Hammer and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Does anyone think the tories bother with this sort of thing and is there another message board out there where people debate the inner workings of the party in the same way?
Dramatic_Hammer-
is there another message board out there where people debate the inner workings of the party in the same way?
not even another forum, another cycling forum, singletrackworld are way more fragmented and argumentative than this thread on their Kier Starmer thread, has twice as many posts as their Boris thread which says alot
greentricky
my understanding is that the changes introduce a new complaints system, to cover all cases about protected characteristics. all NEC decisions on these complaints will be reviewed by a member of the new independent review board and the NCC’s role will be done by the new independent complaints board. the boards will consist of 4 specialist lawyers, 4 human rights experts, and 4 party members. these will be vetted/appointed by the general secretary (who is themself a democratically-elected - but obviously political - appointee). however, as you say, as far as I understand it the EHRC themselves were happy with that arrangement.
individuals' (and presumably momentum's) take on that then comes down to whether you think this is an appropriate arrangement, and I expect that would be largely guided by whether you think the EHRC is beyond reproach.