You are reading a single comment by @andyp and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • as far as I understood it, the party suspended JC's membership and withdrew the whip (both at KS' direction, according to len mccluskey). I'm just going off the recent claims in the graun tho (I don't read or follow any novara/canary/etc content)

    action plan also says they will "collect, analyse, and publish quarterly data that enables a comparison between the handling of antisemitism complaints and other types of complaint." they may have a different meaning of publish ('report to the EHRC'? why not just say that then) or they just not have made the system's changes yet.

    I don't know why momentum directed their delegates to vote against the new proposals either but seems unfair to characterise them as 'unhinged' without knowing/understanding their rationale first. from a cursory google it seems like they did not accept that the proposals would put in place a properly independent process, because of the involvement of the GS (a political appointee) in selecting disciplinary panels. counter argument to that seems to be that the EHRC were happy with that... guess where you land on this would depend on whether you think the EHRC are beyond reproach

  • both at KS' direction, according to len mccluskey

    Well he would say that, wouldn't he. He's about as far from impartial as it's physically possible to be.

  • Well he would say that, wouldn't he. He's about as far from impartial as it's physically possible to be.

    and the account from the other side comes from entirely neutral observers... ?

About

Avatar for andyp @andyp started