Maybe just me, but I'm keen to read his paper! And I don't think publishing it excludes other ways of delivering his message. I think it's a pretty great starting point, and foundational move. In theory. I have two questions though: 1) does it say anything of substance (I guess I'll find out when I find time to read it later), and if yes, 2) will he go out and get that substance heard.
It all looks pretty reasonable. There's nothing revolutionary or particularly exciting in there but, to be honest, I'm not sure that's what's required at the moment.
Maybe just me, but I'm keen to read his paper! And I don't think publishing it excludes other ways of delivering his message. I think it's a pretty great starting point, and foundational move. In theory. I have two questions though: 1) does it say anything of substance (I guess I'll find out when I find time to read it later), and if yes, 2) will he go out and get that substance heard.