-
kafka like discussion of why or why not something may or may not have or have not had or had not been given a stamp or a nod through and why this may or may not reflect either a requirement to pay people more or go back in time.
Lol. I like how this all started because of a semantic issue.
Tesla better hurry up with their self-driving trucks (the ones that won’t hit bikes, people or pets, or any other object for that matter).
Also the argument that you can’t pay X underpaid job more because then underpaid people from another industry will leave their old jobs is hilarious. I expect to hear it at some point from the US republican party, who love “defending the free market” except when it’s inconvenient.
Eseman-
This.
All the undercurrent for the last few years has been driverless vehicles.
(Whether this becomes more than Musk's wet dream we will have to wait and see).
Why would anyone invest the considerable amount of money and time to get an HGV license
when the narrative is 'this industry will soon make you redundant'?
mespilus
I came here for the hot take on co-op sandwiches, stayed for the sex worker benefits and the kafka like discussion of why or why not something may or may not have or have not had or had not been given a stamp or a nod through and why this may or may not reflect either a requirement to pay people more or go back in time.
You can't just pay people more, because that would cause a massive movement from one underpaid job to the new newly paid job.
And I hate doing the dammit eg, but e.g. fruit pickers become truck drivers, truck drivers become ambo drivers, sex workers still suck off who ever.