-
Note that permitted development requires materials to ‘match’ the house - which is why an ugly generic 50k(ish) PD dormer box is clad in hung tile.
It shouldn’t be contentious to get planning permish for similar box but with zinc cladding - but it does change the application procedure - councils will have an ‘spg’ resi design guide which might actually be more restrictive than PD rights so is worth reviewing.
Also - re. “Architects” you absolutely don’t need one but in theory they should add value - increase the quality of outcome across the board and in the first instance help you to figure out what you want, need vs what you might afford.
I doubt the rear extension examples up thread are coming in at sub 100k (especially these days). But they are unique and by published/highly regarded design led firms - you get what you pay for - I’d argue they actually achieve a lot with relatively little budget.
-
Ah yeah, had forgotten about matching materials - seems a ridiculous rule if it ends up with those ugly boxes!
Cheers for the advice. I am definitely open to using an architect but my worry is (as much as anything) finding one I like who wants to take on what will be a small-ish job for them, and then a residual fear about what will be most cost efficient. Might see if I can get in the house first, then scout around for some more info then (hopefully also with a better idea what will give us the biggest QOL improvements)
-
Is it wishful thinking to hope that because my house is on a bit of a slope and the kitchen is a bit raised from the garden then I might be spared some of the costly groundworks on a future extension.
Standard Victorian semi... kitchen is a few steps down from the rest of the house then has a 1ft step out/down into the garden (and 2ft of crawl space underneath the floorboards).
Partner had an extension finished recently and some of the costs were fairly eye watering, but then she was extending a lower ground floor, in an older terrace with literally no foundations to speak of. Mine I would hope would be far more straightforward in terms of access and the amount of 'prep' needed.
The link @hugo7 posted (http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m000wvy2 at ~29:30) where BBC architect suggested essentially a 'cheap' raised base sounds feasible to me.
Not to actually have a raised extension, but just bringing the extension floor up to the rest of the kitchen floor level.
Though I have no idea what I'm talking about. -
Also - re. “Architects”
I think most people in their head imagine the sort of experience portrayed in that BBC thing. Whereas quite often for things like extensions it can be someone knocking out standard drawings that are almost 100% client led.
A mate in a nice part of Bucks found that the only people who'd come and talk to them for their 1960s place didn't offer anything beyond what they'd already thought of. They're quite handy and good with this sort of stuff so could be a reflection on them.
On the other side a nursery friend was talked down from going for the max size as the guy showed them why they didn't need it and that it would kill the outdoor use - which with a young kid they'd need. He's also worked in the area forever so got it straight through planning. The final design is not going to set any hearts racing, but it's a good eg of where the right person can add value.
I also wonder if sometimes what it's that the common designs just simply work 99.9% of the time once you factor everything in.
Interesting, thanks - I guess even generic box on the outside could have zinc cladding or similar to make it look a bit better, if I want to fork out?
Do you mind me asking which company - London based?