You are reading a single comment by @marcom and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Is when things get overanalyzed where a red card should be willed out. I don't think neither of them had the time to think, it just happened without malicious intent.

  • Absolute gaslighting, Jorghino knew exactly what he was doing, went in studs up on a player on the floor then the collapse to try to intimate it was 6 of one and half a dozen of the other. 100% shithousery and thankfully the cynic didn’t get to score the winning penalty as I immediately feared, that would have been too much to take.

    I live in a naive world where a 5 gear Capri is the stuff of a madman’s dreams but I’d love it (LOVE IT) if Tuchel decided to bench Jorghino for 3 games at the start of the new season (he could explain it how he likes, we’d know the real reason). Another decent outcome would be Super Jack sitting him on his arse without touching the ball, bite his thumb at him and pirouette away.

    I may need to get out more

  • Intent is unimportant in the rules. Jorginho has both feet off the ground (albeit briefly) and leads with his studs. Win the ball or not, by the letter of the law it’s a red card. No difference between that and Danielson for Sweden against the Ukraine.

  • Is when things get overanalyzed where a red card

    Violent stamp = red card.

    It's not that complicated

About

Avatar for marcom @marcom started