• Good point, well made.

    Textual, group conversations, with asynchronous reply times and a lack of social contact and history between participants.

    This is not a fertile medium for civil discourse, I'm afraid.

    I don't bemoan this fact, just note it. In the same way as noting that a Nokia 3310 speaker was not a good delivery mechanism for a high fidelity rendition of Blink 182 track, when set as a ringtone.

    Know your audience, but also know your medium.

    If this were an IRL, over a pint conversation between 2 or 3 humans, then I would have more empathy with Stonehedge's empathies.

    NB - I am not claiming that internet conversations cannot ever be civil discourses. Just that they are much less conducive to being such.

  • While all of that may be true, it's a long way from the default assumption many posters seem to have which is anyone with a divergent view is acting in bad faith

  • While all of that may be true, it's a long way from the default assumption many posters seem to have which is anyone with a divergent view is acting in bad faith

    Thanks, you've explained my PoV better than I managed to.

  • I don't see "acting in bad faith". I see " are wrong".

About

Avatar for greentricky @greentricky started