Textual, group conversations, with asynchronous reply times and a lack of social contact and history between participants.
This is not a fertile medium for civil discourse, I'm afraid.
I don't bemoan this fact, just note it. In the same way as noting that a Nokia 3310 speaker was not a good delivery mechanism for a high fidelity rendition of Blink 182 track, when set as a ringtone.
Know your audience, but also know your medium.
If this were an IRL, over a pint conversation between 2 or 3 humans, then I would have more empathy with Stonehedge's empathies.
NB - I am not claiming that internet conversations cannot ever be civil discourses. Just that they are much less conducive to being such.
While all of that may be true, it's a long way from the default assumption many posters seem to have which is anyone with a divergent view is acting in bad faith
While all of that may be true, it's a long way from the default assumption many posters seem to have which is anyone with a divergent view is acting in bad faith
Thanks, you've explained my PoV better than I managed to.
Textual, group conversations, with asynchronous reply times and a lack of social contact and history between participants.
This is not a fertile medium for civil discourse, I'm afraid.
I don't bemoan this fact, just note it. In the same way as noting that a Nokia 3310 speaker was not a good delivery mechanism for a high fidelity rendition of Blink 182 track, when set as a ringtone.
Know your audience, but also know your medium.
If this were an IRL, over a pint conversation between 2 or 3 humans, then I would have more empathy with Stonehedge's empathies.
NB - I am not claiming that internet conversations cannot ever be civil discourses. Just that they are much less conducive to being such.