Another point, that VB often makes and makes well is that these conversations are as much, if not more, for the post-hoc readers than for the participants.
Which I suppose argues in favour of having a healthy mix of Greenhell ire and Stonehedge engagement and debate.
Another point, that VB often makes and makes well is that these conversations are as much, if not more, for the post-hoc readers than for the participants.
Which I suppose argues in favour of having a healthy mix of Greenhell ire and Stonehedge engagement and debate.