You are reading a single comment by @chez_jay and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Yes, risk of inferred matching of individuals from combining multiple data sources is even more complicated. This is one reason why bulk 'anonymised' data still needs controls.
(See https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/what-is-personal-data/can-we-identify-an-individual-indirectly/ if you are interested)
chez_jay
You're not wrong. Its the main reason why NHS Number is not considered to be anonymous.
Even in normal secondary care datasets, its pretty easy to track down somebody if you know a little bit about them. The example I was given in my Caldicott Guardian training was how easy it was to find somebody from information in a newspaper article using a pseudonymous dataset. From memory it was tracking down a 55 year old man who had lost their leg in a motorcycle accident.