-
There are significant legal and cultural barriers to labour organising, especially for precarious, informal workforces that operate predominantly on the 0-hour model. Those barriers exist because unionising works, not the other way around.
I don't understand this. Unionising works and that's why it's not more popular?
-
I don't understand this. Unionising works and that's why it's not more popular?
Unionising works for the members of the unions, which may be seen as bad to capitalist types who may be the rich and powerful ones who would be able to put up barriers to prevent unionism or curtail their powers by donating loads of money governments who are anti union.
There are significant legal and cultural barriers to labour organising, especially for precarious, informal workforces that operate predominantly on the 0-hour model. Those barriers exist because unionising works, not the other way around.
Yes, absolutely. Though you are now talking about "trust" and "social contract" which are relatively washy terms in context of business, and certainly not a concrete legal backbone to ensuring rights are upheld and betterment achieved.
Minimum wage had been debated in the Labour Party for years – and originated as a position on the left. It was opposed by business at the time and seen as a vulnerability rather than a winning policy.