If these arguments about the Brexit party being the only reason Labour held the seat are correct then it makes even less sense that an arch-remainer was imposed on the seat.
Those arguments also assume that all 2019 Brexit party voters swung over from the tories, which is something that I don't think is plausible given the changes in vote share:
If these arguments about the Brexit party being the only reason Labour held the seat are correct then it makes even less sense that an arch-remainer was imposed on the seat.
Those arguments also assume that all 2019 Brexit party voters swung over from the tories, which is something that I don't think is plausible given the changes in vote share: