You are reading a single comment by @dinosaur and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
I read that about the women's race having more viewers but it was misleading reporting i think. they showed 3 hours of the men's race and only 1 hour of the women's. the stat they reported was average over the duration. not many would have watched the full 3 hours.
they also reported the number of people that had watched each race at all and there were loads more for the men's.
suggests to me that they should have shown more of the women's race and less of the men's. (ie. more than 1 hour for women and less than 3 hours for men.) It might have been tricky since it was all on a circuit in this case though.
dinosaur
Nah, a Belgian won it.
If Van der Poel was in his position though...
Interesting fact that the women’s version of Amstel Gold drew more viewers than the men’s.
Good news for the women’s races and also the star power of the likes of Vos and Van Vleuten? They did have an all Dutch podium.
I guess more British people might have watched AGR men’s because Pidcock was a contender?