-
I totally understand where you were coming from.
Most laws to an extent infringe on somebodies ability to do something. But most of them do so because the something has a negative effect on others (assault, theft, murder etc)
But walking on land doesn’t impact anybody other than the people who will now be criminalised for doing it.
The scales are heavily tipped in the wrong direction.
Serious answer
This act is an infringement of civil liberties. Can we agree on this?
I was making a point of something that has happened to me, and how the act is said to deter people from doing these things but forgetting or glossing over what the act will criminalise.