In theory, so that we can spread them around a bit, and actually get to use them once the bombs start flying, rather than the whole stockpile being destroyed in a first strike.
Assuming we're not already glowing silhouettes by then anyway.
I think the answer you are looking for is that there is no realistic situation where it is better to have 260 nukes than 180
A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
How about a nice game of chess?
It looks like the tories have found a realistic situation where they need more nukes - they're about to start bombing anyone for any old reason
What happens when you have a xenomorph infestation and have to take off to nuke the site from orbit?
The more the better in my book.
@Lebowski started
London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed is a community of predominantly fixed gear and single-speed cyclists in and around London, UK.
This site is supported almost exclusively by donations. Please consider donating a small amount regularly.
In theory, so that we can spread them around a bit, and actually get to use them once the bombs start flying, rather than the whole stockpile being destroyed in a first strike.
Assuming we're not already glowing silhouettes by then anyway.